Looks like Star Trek is pulling a Spock and bringing itself back to life. But it’s not the Genesis planet doing the resurrecting* — it’s J.J. Abrams, creator of “Lost” and “Alias.”
More than three years after the last “Star Trek” movie crashed at the box office, the venerable sci-fi franchise is being revived by the director of the upcoming “Mission: Impossible” sequel, Daily Variety reported in its Friday edition.
[...]
The project will be directed by J.J. Abrams, whose Tom Cruise vehicle “Mission: Impossible III” will be released by Paramount on May 5. Abrams, famed for producing the TV shows “Alias” and “Lost,” will also help write and produce.
Daily Variety said the action would center on the early days of “Star Trek” characters James T. Kirk and Mr. Spock, including their first meeting at Starfleet Academy and first outer-space mission.
I actually first read about this on Cinescape Friday morning, but they’re hardly America’s Trusted Source of news, let alone mine. But since CNN is now reporting on it, I suppose there is some veracity to the story.
I’m not too sure how I feel about this little endeavor. Abrams is pretty solid when it comes to his TV shows, and we can more accurately judge his ability to handle a feature after M:I 3 comes out. But it’s when we get to the story and characters that the ground becomes unsteady.
The most recent Star Trek show, “Enterprise,” performed dismally in the ratings. Many fans and critics didn’t like it. I wasn’t one of these people. I thought it was nearly as strong as “TNG,” perhaps even moreso. The storylines were epic, Scott Bakula made a kickass captain, and there was an extremely hot Vulcan. The only area the show was lacking, I think, was with the supporting cast. Aside from Archer (Bakula) and T’Pol the Vulcan, the only other interesting character was the Chief Engineer, Trip. But my point, despite how long it took to arrive to it, is that “Enterprise” was a prequel show that did badly even though and it was good. But its characters were previously unestablished. No one had ever heard of these people before. Some of the storylines, especially those in Season Four, were referenced in a couple of the original series, but basically it was all new.
Which leads me to Star Trek 11.
It, too, is a prequel , but it features characters that have been in the country’s, no, the world’s collective consciousness for nearly fifty years. Captain Kirk and Mister Spock are household names. Everyone knows who they are, whether or not they’re sci-fi aficionados. Now can you imagine actors portraying these guys other than William Shatner and Leonard Nimoy? Even much younger actors? I certainly can’t picture anyone convincingly utter Kirk’s lines in Shatner’s halting, over-the-top delivery.
So . . . we’ve got a prequel premise, which has tanked before, and we’ve got iconic characters being played by actors other than the ones who made them famous? Not to be a naysayer, but the whole project just seems doomed to critical and box office mediocrity. I think I’ll enjoy the film, especially with J.J. Abrams directing and cowriting, but frankly I doubt it will reinvigorate the Star Trek franchise like Paramount is clearly hoping it will. But I could be wrong. Star Trek 11 may come out and be a commercial and critical success, thus marking the beginning of an unheralded new, golden era for all things Star Trek. . . .
But I doubt it.
JAB
* I’m such a fucking nerd.