I’m only watching one new TV show this year, and that is “Bones” on Fox. I’m almost loath to start watching new shows, especially on Fox, since they always seem to get cancelled after five episodes. However, I’m not especially worried about Fox giving the ax to this show since it isn’t in sci-fi or supernaturally themed (*cough* “Firefly,” “Birds of Prey,” “Wonderfalls” *cough*).
“Bones” is basically about this weird, asskicking, forensic anthropologist woman who basically can take a skeleton or some flesh melted on a car seat, and tell who that person was, how they died, what they ate for breakfast the morning of their death, and quite possibly what they ate when they were four. She hangs out with some FBI agent and they solve crimes, along with the help of her wacky staff. That’s basically the whole plot.
I don’t generally watch procedurals, which is what this is, and in particular I despise “CSI.” I find their methods of investigation fairly ludicrous, as I sort of indicated in the above paragraph. For instance, in the second episode of “Bones” she can tell all sorts of basic and not-so-basic things about the murdered guy. Okay, that’s to be expected. But then the line of reasoning spans from finding out the dead dude had dioxin poisoning, to finding the murderer because the type of drywall the killer used contained chemicals that were in the poison, and that drywall was only used by this one particular architect in the 1920s, who designed this neighborhood of houses. Then BAM, they locate the murderer. Seriously — give me a fucking break.
Still, despite the ludicrous jumps in reasoning and logic, I find myself enjoying the show. This is due to the characters. The two leads share a very good chemistry, some of which, of course, is sexual. David Boreanaz, the FBI agent named Seely, is the sole reason I started watching “Bones” in the first place. He was formerly the title character in “Angel,” a show I dearly miss. The forensic anthropologist, whose nickname is Bones, is a little…I dunno, unbelievable in her depiction. She’s no-nonsense, a genius, has almost no empathy for the victims’ families (“You can have your daughter’s remains back soon, once we locate all of the pieces”), and has an all-around hard-on for dead people. The supporting cast, aside from being a little cliched (paranoid and dry-witted guy, snarky intern, meddlesome-yet-sweet best friend Bones), for the most part work well. Plus, while Bones and Seely are out moving the story along, the lab team can do all the science and stuff.
The only thing I truly hate about the show is the nickname for scientists, which is “squints.” It’s an annoying name that I don’t find funny or interesting in the least. I wish it would just be dropped from the show’s lexicon.
Overall, I’d give “Bones” a shot, especially if you’re into shows like “CSI.” I’ll continue to watch it, so long as the show continues to find its right tone and remain interesting.
JAB